↓ Skip to main content

Distribution of an Invasive Aquatic Pathogen (Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia Virus) in the Great Lakes and Its Relationship to Shipping

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distribution of an Invasive Aquatic Pathogen (Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia Virus) in the Great Lakes and Its Relationship to Shipping
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark B. Bain, Emily R. Cornwell, Kristine M. Hope, Geofrey E. Eckerlin, Rufina N. Casey, Geoffrey H. Groocock, Rodman G. Getchell, Paul R. Bowser, James R. Winton, William N. Batts, Allegra Cangelosi, James W. Casey

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Chile 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 64 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 22%
Student > Master 13 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Other 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 48%
Environmental Science 11 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 11 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,870,303
of 21,200,930 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#77,675
of 180,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,337
of 421,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,005
of 5,211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,200,930 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 180,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.