↓ Skip to main content

Dreissenid mussels are not a “dead end” in Great Lakes food webs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Great Lakes Research, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dreissenid mussels are not a “dead end” in Great Lakes food webs
Published in
Journal of Great Lakes Research, January 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.jglr.2009.09.001
Authors

Charles P. Madenjian, Steven A. Pothoven, Philip J. Schneeberger, Mark P. Ebener, Lloyd C. Mohr, Thomas F. Nalepa, James R. Bence

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Mexico 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 57 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 32%
Researcher 18 29%
Other 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 38%
Environmental Science 21 33%
Engineering 3 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,538,310
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#210
of 1,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,384
of 176,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.