↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Amphibian Chytrid Fungus on Individual Survival Probability in Wild Boreal Toads

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Amphibian Chytrid Fungus on Individual Survival Probability in Wild Boreal Toads
Published in
Conservation Biology, April 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01506.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

DAVID S. PILLIOD, ERIN MUTHS, RICK D. SCHERER, PAUL E. BARTELT, PAUL STEPHEN CORN, BLAKE R. HOSSACK, BRAD A. LAMBERT, REBECCA MCCAFFERY, CHRISTOPHER GAUGHAN

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 5%
Brazil 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 173 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 23%
Researcher 37 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 16 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 119 62%
Environmental Science 30 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 18 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,202,160
of 19,097,846 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#2,266
of 3,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,058
of 407,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,097,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.