↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Amphibian Chytrid Fungus on Individual Survival Probability in Wild Boreal Toads

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Amphibian Chytrid Fungus on Individual Survival Probability in Wild Boreal Toads
Published in
Conservation Biology, April 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01506.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

DAVID S. PILLIOD, ERIN MUTHS, RICK D. SCHERER, PAUL E. BARTELT, PAUL STEPHEN CORN, BLAKE R. HOSSACK, BRAD A. LAMBERT, REBECCA MCCAFFERY, CHRISTOPHER GAUGHAN

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 5%
Brazil 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 177 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 23%
Researcher 38 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 15%
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 15 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 121 62%
Environmental Science 31 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 17 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,762,871
of 20,807,010 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#2,352
of 3,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,352
of 418,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,807,010 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.