You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Are inland wolf–ungulate systems influenced by marine subsidies of Pacific salmon?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1890/08-1437.1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Layne G. Adams, Sean D. Farley, Craig A. Stricker, Dominic J. Demma, Gretchen H. Roffler, Dennis C. Miller, Robert O. Rye |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 3% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 245 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 57 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 14% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 44 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 143 | 52% |
| Environmental Science | 62 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 47 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,478,696
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#658
of 3,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,137
of 173,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#9
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.