↓ Skip to main content

Implications of estimated magmatic additions and recycling losses at the subduction zones of accretionary (non-collisional) and collisional (suturing) orogens

Overview of attention for article published in Geological Society, London, Special Publications, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implications of estimated magmatic additions and recycling losses at the subduction zones of accretionary (non-collisional) and collisional (suturing) orogens
Published in
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, June 2009
DOI 10.1144/sp318.4
Authors

David W. Scholl, Roland von Huene

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 79 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 27%
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor 8 10%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 4 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 65 78%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Unknown 14 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2017.
All research outputs
#6,017,115
of 18,523,374 outputs
Outputs from Geological Society, London, Special Publications
#527
of 1,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,679
of 403,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geological Society, London, Special Publications
#48
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,523,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.