You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Randomized clinical trial comparing pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and periarticular local anesthetic infiltration for total hip arthroplasty
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1136/rapm-2023-104332 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniela Bravo, Julián Aliste, Sebastián Layera, Diego Fernández, Hans Erpel, Germán Aguilera, Hernán Arancibia, Cristián Barrientos, Rodrigo Wulf, Sebastián León, Julián Brañes, Roderick J Finlayson, De Q Tran |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 12% |
| Chile | 5 | 10% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 14% |
| Scientists | 4 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 25% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,099,276
of 24,699,496 outputs
Outputs from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#96
of 2,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,747
of 411,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#3
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,699,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.