↓ Skip to main content

Past SARS-CoV-2 infection protection against re-infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 40,945)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Past SARS-CoV-2 infection protection against re-infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
The Lancet, March 2023
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02465-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline Stein, Hasan Nassereldine, Reed J D Sorensen, Joanne O Amlag, Catherine Bisignano, Sam Byrne, Emma Castro, Kaleb Coberly, James K Collins, Jeremy Dalos, Farah Daoud, Amanda Deen, Emmanuela Gakidou, John R Giles, Erin N Hulland, Bethany M Huntley, Kasey E Kinzel, Rafael Lozano, Ali H Mokdad, Tom Pham, David M Pigott, Robert C Reiner Jr., Theo Vos, Simon I Hay, Christopher J L Murray, Stephen S Lim

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12,137 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 129 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 26 20%
Researcher 25 19%
Other 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 24 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 25%
Unspecified 27 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 31 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10767. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2023.
All research outputs
#156
of 23,864,146 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#17
of 40,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5
of 420,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#2
of 343 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,864,146 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 343 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.