↓ Skip to main content

Conservation biology for suites of species: Demographic modeling for Pacific island kingfishers

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Conservation biology for suites of species: Demographic modeling for Pacific island kingfishers
Published in
Biological Conservation, May 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.12.023
Authors

Dylan C. Kesler, Susan M. Haig

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 8%
South Africa 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 53 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Master 8 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 67%
Environmental Science 15 25%
Unspecified 4 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,994,819
of 13,415,696 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,198
of 3,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,039
of 375,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#61
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,415,696 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.