You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, March 2023
Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco, Kamilla Mayr Martins Sá, Giovanna Marcílio Santos, Elaine Marcílio Santos, Rafael Leite Pacheco, Rachel Riera
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2||33%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Postgraduate||2||33%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||17%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||17%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||17%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||17%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,594,795 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
of 1,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 408,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,594,795 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,059 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.