You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
河川生態の視覚化に関する展示論的考察―水族館の生息環境展示を事例として―
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecology and Civil Engineering, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.3825/ece.20.61 |
Authors |
吉冨 友恭, 田代 喬 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Ecology and Civil Engineering
#51
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,035
of 472,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology and Civil Engineering
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them