You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characterizing modifications to a comparative effectiveness research study: the OPTIMIZE trial—using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Interventions (FRAME)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-023-07150-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie M. Fritz, Tom Greene, Gerard P. Brennan, Kate Minick, Elizabeth Lane, Stephen T. Wegener, Richard L. Skolasky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 17% |
| Psychology | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2023.
All research outputs
#15,923,424
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,154
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,771
of 430,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.