↓ Skip to main content

Trends in incidence of youth-onset type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the USA, 2002–18: results from the population-based SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
63 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
76 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trends in incidence of youth-onset type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the USA, 2002–18: results from the population-based SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study
Published in
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, February 2023
DOI 10.1016/s2213-8587(23)00025-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynne E Wagenknecht, Jean M Lawrence, Scott Isom, Elizabeth T Jensen, Dana Dabelea, Angela D Liese, Lawrence M Dolan, Amy S Shah, Anna Bellatorre, Katherine Sauder, Santica Marcovina, Kristi Reynolds, Catherine Pihoker, Giuseppina Imperatore, Jasmin Divers, SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 139 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 15 11%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Master 8 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 7 5%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 75 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 14%
Unspecified 17 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 77 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 512. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2024.
All research outputs
#53,577
of 26,629,686 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
#72
of 2,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,507
of 432,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
#1
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,629,686 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 78.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.