You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Stationary and drone-assisted methane plume localization with dispersion spectroscopy
Remote Sensing of Environment, May 2023
Michael G. Soskind, Nathan P. Li, Daniel P. Moore, Yifeng Chen, Lars P. Wendt, James McSpiritt, Mark A. Zondlo, Gerard Wysocki
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||9||75%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||8%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||20%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||1||10%|
|Physics and Astronomy||1||10%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Remote Sensing of Environment
of 3,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 388,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Remote Sensing of Environment
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.