You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Flood of Microbial Genomes–Do We Need More?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0005831 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Niyaz Ahmed |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 7% |
| Portugal | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 68 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 22% |
| Professor | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 58% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2012.
All research outputs
#1,641,926
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#21,256
of 193,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,494
of 112,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#70
of 505 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 505 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.