↓ Skip to main content

A DINÂMICA ABOLICIONISTA NAS LOJAS MAÇÔNICAS DE SÃO PAULO (1850-1888)

Overview of attention for article published in Almanack, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A DINÂMICA ABOLICIONISTA NAS LOJAS MAÇÔNICAS DE SÃO PAULO (1850-1888)
Published in
Almanack, January 2022
DOI 10.1590/2236-463332ea00521
Authors

Renata Ribeiro Francisco

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,102,287
of 23,372,207 outputs
Outputs from Almanack
#45
of 73 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,932
of 508,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Almanack
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,372,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 73 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.