The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Medical and nursing clinician perspectives on the usability of the hospital electronic medical record: A qualitative analysis.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Information Management Journal, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1177/18333583231154624 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sheree Lloyd, Karrie Long, Yasmine Probst, Josie Di Donato, Abraham Oshni Alvandi, Jeremy Roach, Christopher Bain |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 15 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Researcher | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 15 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 35 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,494,654
of 26,213,016 outputs
Outputs from Health Information Management Journal
#16
of 179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,685
of 431,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Information Management Journal
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,213,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them