↓ Skip to main content

Heavy metal contamination of sediments in the Upper Connecting Channels of the Great Lakes

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrobiologia, July 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heavy metal contamination of sediments in the Upper Connecting Channels of the Great Lakes
Published in
Hydrobiologia, July 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00024763
Authors

S. J. Nichols, B. A. Manny, D. W. Schloesser, T. A. Edsall

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 8%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Student > Master 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Other 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Hydrobiologia
#1
of 5 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,994
of 16,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrobiologia
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.