You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of two techniques of goal directed fluid therapy in elective neurosurgical patients – a randomized controlled study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Neurosurgery, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1080/02688697.2023.2173722 |
| Authors |
Ankita Dey, Prasanna Udupi Bidkar, Srinivasan Swaminathan, Manoranjitha Kumari M, Jerry Jame Joy, Mukilan Balasubramanian, Sakshi Bhimsaria |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 50% |
| Other | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 117. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2023.
All research outputs
#314,088
of 23,505,669 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Neurosurgery
#1
of 999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,043
of 422,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Neurosurgery
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,669 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 999 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.