↓ Skip to main content

Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
491 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004014.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C, Maher, Christopher, Feiner, Benjamin, Baessler, Kaven, Schmid, Corina

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse may occur in up to 50% of parous women. A variety of urinary, bowel and sexual symptoms may be associated with the prolapse.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 258 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 <1%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 <1%
Unknown 256 99%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 <1%
Unknown 256 99%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2019.
All research outputs
#596,957
of 13,331,643 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,934
of 10,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,427
of 149,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,331,643 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.