↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: luxated (dislodged) teeth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: luxated (dislodged) teeth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006203.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flavia M Belmonte, Cristiane R Macedo, Peter F Day, Humberto Saconato, Virginia Fernandes Moça Trevisani

Abstract

Dental trauma is common especially in children and young adults. One group of dento-alveolar injuries is classified as luxation. This group includes a subgroup of severe injuries where the tooth is displaced from its original position. These injuries are classified further by the direction in which the tooth has been displaced, namely: intrusion, extrusion and lateral luxation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 27%
Unspecified 14 25%
Other 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 54%
Unspecified 15 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2017.
All research outputs
#654,461
of 13,515,188 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,091
of 10,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,043
of 149,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,515,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.