The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Antimicrobial Effect of the Amniotic Membrane Isolated and Associated with Photodynamic Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of functional biomaterials, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3390/jfb14030151 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amanda Cerquearo Rodrigues dos Santos, Guilherme Rodrigues Teodoro, Juliana Ferreira-Strixino, Luciana Barros Sant’Anna |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,862,170
of 26,171,302 outputs
Outputs from Journal of functional biomaterials
#116
of 757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,718
of 430,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of functional biomaterials
#4
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,171,302 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 757 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.