You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
c-kitpos GATA-4 High Rat Cardiac Stem Cells Foster Adult Cardiomyocyte Survival through IGF-1 Paracrine Signalling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0014297 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nanako Kawaguchi, Andrew J. Smith, Cheryl D. Waring, Kamrul Hasan, Shinka Miyamoto, Rumiko Matsuoka, Georgina M. Ellison |
| Abstract |
Resident c-kit positive (c-kitpos) cardiac stem cells (CSCs) could be considered the most appropriate cell type for myocardial regeneration therapies. However, much is still unknown regarding their biological properties and potential. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 41% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2010.
All research outputs
#5,468,597
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#66,423
of 193,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,693
of 180,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#399
of 1,027 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,027 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.