↓ Skip to main content

A Role for Calcium-Permeable AMPA Receptors in Synaptic Plasticity and Learning

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Role for Calcium-Permeable AMPA Receptors in Synaptic Plasticity and Learning
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0012818
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian J. Wiltgen, Gordon A. Royle, Erin E. Gray, Andrea Abdipranoto, Nopporn Thangthaeng, Nate Jacobs, Faysal Saab, Susumu Tonegawa, Stephen F. Heinemann, Thomas J. O'Dell, Michael S. Fanselow, Bryce Vissel

Abstract

A central concept in the field of learning and memory is that NMDARs are essential for synaptic plasticity and memory formation. Surprisingly then, multiple studies have found that behavioral experience can reduce or eliminate the contribution of these receptors to learning. The cellular mechanisms that mediate learning in the absence of NMDAR activation are currently unknown. To address this issue, we examined the contribution of Ca(2+)-permeable AMPARs to learning and plasticity in the hippocampus. Mutant mice were engineered with a conditional genetic deletion of GluR2 in the CA1 region of the hippocampus (GluR2-cKO mice). Electrophysiology experiments in these animals revealed a novel form of long-term potentiation (LTP) that was independent of NMDARs and mediated by GluR2-lacking Ca(2+)-permeable AMPARs. Behavioral analyses found that GluR2-cKO mice were impaired on multiple hippocampus-dependent learning tasks that required NMDAR activation. This suggests that AMPAR-mediated LTP interferes with NMDAR-dependent plasticity. In contrast, NMDAR-independent learning was normal in knockout mice and required the activation of Ca(2+)-permeable AMPARs. These results suggest that GluR2-lacking AMPARs play a functional and previously unidentified role in learning; they appear to mediate changes in synaptic strength that occur after plasticity has been established by NMDARs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Netherlands 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 188 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 28%
Researcher 37 19%
Student > Bachelor 30 15%
Student > Master 22 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 7%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 41%
Neuroscience 52 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Psychology 6 3%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 25 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2010.
All research outputs
#5,468,597
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#66,423
of 193,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,864
of 98,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#392
of 911 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 911 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.