You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Scaling Up Towards International Targets for AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria: Contribution of Global Fund-Supported Programs in 2011–2015
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0017166 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Itamar Katz, Ryuichi Komatsu, Daniel Low-Beer, Rifat Atun |
| Abstract |
The paper projects the contribution to 2011-2015 international targets of three major pandemics by programs in 140 countries funded by the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, the largest external financier of tuberculosis and malaria programs and a major external funder of HIV programs in low and middle income countries. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Cambodia | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 21% |
| Researcher | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2011.
All research outputs
#4,462,674
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#61,253
of 193,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,567
of 106,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#413
of 1,324 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,324 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.