↓ Skip to main content

Pyrosequencing for Mini-Barcoding of Fresh and Old Museum Specimens

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pyrosequencing for Mini-Barcoding of Fresh and Old Museum Specimens
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0021252
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shadi Shokralla, Xin Zhou, Daniel H. Janzen, Winnie Hallwachs, Jean-François Landry, Luke M. Jacobus, Mehrdad Hajibabaei

Abstract

DNA barcoding is an effective approach for species identification and for discovery of new and/or cryptic species. Sanger sequencing technology is the method of choice for obtaining standard 650 bp cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) barcodes. However, DNA degradation/fragmentation makes it difficult to obtain a full-length barcode from old specimens. Mini-barcodes of 130 bp from the standard barcode region have been shown to be effective for accurate identification in many animal groups and may be readily obtained from museum samples. Here we demonstrate the application of an alternative sequencing technology, the four-enzymes single-specimen pyrosequencing, in rapid, cost-effective mini-barcode analysis. We were able to generate sequences of up to 100 bp from mini-barcode fragments of COI in 135 fresh and 50 old Lepidoptera specimens (ranging from 53-97 year-old). The sequences obtained using pyrosequencing were of high quality and we were able to robustly match all the tested pyro-sequenced samples to their respective Sanger-sequenced standard barcode sequences, where available. Simplicity of the protocol and instrumentation coupled with higher speed and lower cost per sequence than Sanger sequencing makes this approach potentially useful in efforts to link standard barcode sequences from unidentified specimens to known museum specimens with only short DNA fragments.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 132 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 21%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Environmental Science 8 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 21 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,568,993
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#32,484
of 193,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,156
of 119,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#369
of 2,281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.