↓ Skip to main content

Isolation and Characterization of Three Mammalian Orthoreoviruses from European Bats

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Isolation and Characterization of Three Mammalian Orthoreoviruses from European Bats
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0043106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Kohl, René Lesnik, Annika Brinkmann, Arnt Ebinger, Aleksandar Radonić, Andreas Nitsche, Kristin Mühldorfer, Gudrun Wibbelt, Andreas Kurth

Abstract

In recent years novel human respiratory disease agents have been described in South East Asia and Australia. The causative pathogens were classified as pteropine orthoreoviruses with strong phylogenetic relationship to orthoreoviruses of flying foxes inhabiting these regions. Subsequently, a zoonotic bat-to-human transmission has been assumed. We report the isolation of three novel mammalian orthoreoviruses (MRVs) from European bats, comprising bat-borne orthoreovirus outside of South East Asia and Australia and moreover detected in insectivorous bats (Microchiroptera). MRVs are well known to infect a broad range of mammals including man. Although they are associated with rather mild and clinically unapparent infections in their hosts, there is growing evidence of their ability to also induce more severe illness in dogs and man. In this study, eight out of 120 vespertilionid bats proved to be infected with one out of three novel MRV isolates, with a distinct organ tropism for the intestine. One isolate was analyzed by 454 genome sequencing. The obtained strain T3/Bat/Germany/342/08 had closest phylogenetic relationship to MRV strain T3D/04, isolated from a dog. These novel reoviruses provide a rare chance of gaining insight into possible transmission events and of tracing the evolution of bat viruses.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 71 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 24%
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 8%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 19 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2017.
All research outputs
#3,078,372
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#40,479
of 193,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,525
of 167,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#693
of 4,229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.