You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sublethal effects of chronic lead ingestion in mallard ducks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1080/15287397609529395 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mack T. Finley, Michael P. Dieter, Louis N. Locke |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 1977.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A
#867
of 2,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,776
of 106,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A
#184
of 464 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 464 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.