You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A sequential, multiple assignment randomized trial comparing web-based education to mobile video interpreter access for improving provider interpreter use in primary care clinics: the mVOCAL hybrid type 3 study protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, March 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13012-023-01263-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
K. Casey Lion, Chuan Zhou, Paul Fishman, Kirsten Senturia, Allison Cole, Kenneth Sherr, Douglas J. Opel, James Stout, Carmen E. Hazim, Louise Warren, Bonnie H. Rains, Cara C. Lewis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 19 | 58% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 20 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,871,316
of 25,118,194 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,558
of 1,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,276
of 415,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,118,194 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.