↓ Skip to main content

Birth Outcomes in Relation to Prenatal Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Stress in the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program

Overview of attention for article published in this source, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
75 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
47 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Birth Outcomes in Relation to Prenatal Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Stress in the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program
Published by
Environmental Health Perspectives, March 2023
DOI 10.1289/ehp10723
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy M. Padula, Xuejuan Ning, Shivani Bakre, Emily S. Barrett, Tracy Bastain, Deborah H. Bennett, Michael S. Bloom, Carrie V. Breton, Anne L. Dunlop, Stephanie M. Eick, Assiamira Ferrara, Abby Fleisch, Sarah Geiger, Dana E. Goin, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Margaret R. Karagas, Susan Korrick, John D. Meeker, Rachel Morello-Frosch, Thomas G. O’Connor, Emily Oken, Morgan Robinson, Megan E. Romano, Susan L. Schantz, Rebecca J. Schmidt, Anne P. Starling, Yeyi Zhu, Ghassan B. Hamra, Tracey J. Woodruff, the program collaborators for Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent and ubiquitous chemicals associated with risk of adverse birth outcomes. Results of previous studies have been inconsistent. Associations between PFAS and birth outcomes may be affected by psychosocial stress. We estimated risk of adverse birth outcomes in relation to prenatal PFAS concentrations and evaluate whether maternal stress modifies those relationships. We included 3,339 participants from 11 prospective prenatal cohorts in the Environmental influences on the Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program to estimate the associations of five PFAS and birth outcomes. We stratified by perceived stress scale scores to examine effect modification and used Bayesian Weighted Sums to estimate mixtures of PFAS. We observed reduced birth size with increased concentrations of all PFAS. For a 1-unit higher log-normalized exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), and perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), we observed lower birthweight-for-gestational-age z-scores of β=-0.15 [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.27, -0.03], β=-0.14 (95% CI: -0.28, -0.002), β=-0.22 (95% CI: -0.23, -0.10), β=-0.06 (95% CI: -0.18, 0.06), and β=-0.25 (95% CI: -0.37, -0.14), respectively. We observed a lower odds ratio (OR) for large-for-gestational-age: ORPFNA=0.56 (95% CI: 0.38, 0.83), ORPFDA=0.52 (95% CI: 0.35, 0.77). For a 1-unit increase in log-normalized concentration of summed PFAS, we observed a lower birthweight-for-gestational-age z-score [-0.28; 95% highest posterior density (HPD): -0.44, -0.14] and decreased odds of large-for-gestational-age (OR=0.49; 95% HPD: 0.29, 0.82). Perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) explained the highest percentage (40%) of the summed effect in both models. Associations were not modified by maternal perceived stress. Our large, multi-cohort study of PFAS and adverse birth outcomes found a negative association between prenatal PFAS and birthweight-for-gestational-age, and the associations were not different in groups with high vs. low perceived stress. This study can help inform policy to reduce exposures in the environment and humans. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10723.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 14 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 15 54%