You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
数学基礎論の伝統と新しい手法 : 逆数学
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science, January 2004
|
DOI | 10.4288/kisoron1954.32.3 |
Authors |
田中 一之 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 29% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,266,706
of 25,085,910 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science
#14
of 138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,256
of 141,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,085,910 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them