↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic implication of heterogeneity and trajectory progression induced by enzalutamide in prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic implication of heterogeneity and trajectory progression induced by enzalutamide in prostate cancer
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, March 2023
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2023.1148898
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuanfa Feng, Yulin Deng, Zhenfeng Tang, Shanghua Cai, Jinchuang Li, Ren Liu, Jiaming Wan, Huichan He, Guohua Zeng, Jianheng Ye, Zhaodong Han, Weide Zhong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
#16,108,300
of 25,927,633 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#3,708
of 13,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,532
of 431,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#190
of 871 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,927,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 871 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.