↓ Skip to main content

A Bispecific METxMET Antibody–Drug Conjugate with Cleavable Linker Is Processed in Recycling and Late Endosomes

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Bispecific METxMET Antibody–Drug Conjugate with Cleavable Linker Is Processed in Recycling and Late Endosomes
Published in
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, January 2023
DOI 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-22-0414
Authors

Andres E. Perez Bay, Devon Faulkner, John O. DaSilva, Tara M. Young, Katie Yang, Jason T. Giurleo, Dangshe Ma, Frank J. Delfino, William C. Olson, Gavin Thurston, Christopher Daly, Julian Andreev

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2023.
All research outputs
#18,893,847
of 23,410,748 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
#3,359
of 3,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,338
of 427,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
#21
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,410,748 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.