The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Digital tools and agricultural market transformation in Africa: Why are they not at scale yet, and what will it take to get there?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Food Policy, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102439 |
| Authors |
Gashaw T. Abate, Kibrom A. Abay, Jordan Chamberlin, Yumna Kassim, David J. Spielman, Martin Paul Jr Tabe-Ojong |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Cameroon | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Senegal | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Malawi | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 77% |
| Scientists | 11 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 194 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 9% |
| Researcher | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 10 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 101 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 16 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 106 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,109,029
of 26,166,431 outputs
Outputs from Food Policy
#125
of 1,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,313
of 429,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Policy
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,166,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.