↓ Skip to main content

The effect of herbal medicine in innate immunity to Candida albicans

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of herbal medicine in innate immunity to Candida albicans
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, March 2023
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1096383
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meng-Yuan Bao, Ming Li, Qing-Ru Bu, Yue Yang, Hang Song, Chang-Zhong Wang, Tian-Ming Wang, Ning Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#17,686,774
of 25,928,676 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#20,840
of 32,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,209
of 426,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#881
of 1,480 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,928,676 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,480 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.