The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What works in medication reconciliation: an on-treatment and site analysis of the MARQUIS2 study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Quality & Safety, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-014806 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeffrey L Schnipper, Harry Reyes Nieva, Catherine Yoon, Meghan Mallouk, Amanda S Mixon, Stephanie Rennke, Eugene S Chu, Stephanie K Mueller, G Randy Smith, Mark V Williams, Tosha B Wetterneck, Jason Stein, Anuj K Dalal, Stephanie Labonville, Anirudh Sridharan, Deonni P Stolldorf, Endel John Orav, Marcus Gresham, Jenna Goldstein, Sara Platt, Christopher Tugbéh Nyenpan, Eric Howell, Sunil Kripalani |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 21% |
| Scientists | 6 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 25% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 19% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 298. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2024.
All research outputs
#121,793
of 26,200,644 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#35
of 2,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,155
of 429,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,200,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.