You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
They Can’t All Be Stars: The Matthew Effect, Cumulative Status Bias, and Status Persistence in NBA All-Star Elections
|
---|---|
Published in |
American Sociological Review, March 2023
|
DOI | 10.1177/00031224231159139 |
Authors |
Thomas Biegert, Michael Kühhirt, Wim Van Lancker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 12% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
Germany | 3 | 6% |
Spain | 2 | 4% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 27 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 26 | 53% |
Members of the public | 19 | 39% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 25% |
Researcher | 3 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 11 | 46% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 8% |
Psychology | 2 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,028,789
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from American Sociological Review
#352
of 1,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,975
of 424,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Sociological Review
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.