↓ Skip to main content

Mitigation Strategies for Pandemic Influenza A: Balancing Conflicting Policy Objectives

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
40 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mitigation Strategies for Pandemic Influenza A: Balancing Conflicting Policy Objectives
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, February 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001076
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Déirdre Hollingsworth, Don Klinkenberg, Hans Heesterbeek, Roy M. Anderson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 3%
United States 3 2%
Israel 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 173 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Master 22 12%
Professor 14 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 6%
Other 40 22%
Unknown 40 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 10%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 4%
Mathematics 8 4%
Other 52 28%
Unknown 55 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2024.
All research outputs
#938,031
of 25,863,888 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#697
of 9,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,270
of 197,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#1
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,863,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.