You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
mScarlet3: a brilliant and fast-maturing red fluorescent protein
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41592-023-01809-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Theodorus W. J. Gadella, Laura van Weeren, Jente Stouthamer, Mark A. Hink, Anouk H. G. Wolters, Ben N. G. Giepmans, Sylvain Aumonier, Jérôme Dupuy, Antoine Royant |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 458 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 102 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 30 | 7% |
| Germany | 24 | 5% |
| France | 21 | 5% |
| Japan | 18 | 4% |
| Canada | 13 | 3% |
| Spain | 9 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 9 | 2% |
| Portugal | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 54 | 12% |
| Unknown | 171 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 241 | 53% |
| Scientists | 208 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 200 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 22% |
| Unknown | 58 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 61 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 312. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#112,358
of 25,936,091 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#57
of 5,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,905
of 426,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#2
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,936,091 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.