You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anatomical and functional brain imaging in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)—A neurological view
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, September 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00406-006-1005-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc Schneider, Wolfgang Retz, Andrew Coogan, Johannes Thome, Michael Rösler |
| Abstract |
In this review, we discuss current structural and functional imaging data on ADHD in a neurological and neuroanatomical framework. At present, the literature on adult ADHD is somewhat sparse, and so results from imaging have to therefore be considered mainly from the childhood or adolescence perspective. Most work has considered the impairment of executive functions (motor execution, inhibition, working memory), and as such a number of attention networks and their anatomical correlates are discussed in this review (e.g. the cerebello-(thalamo-)-striato-cortical network seems to play a pivotal role in ADHD pathology from childhood to adulthood). The core findings in ADHD imaging are alterations in the architecture and function of prefrontal cortex and cerebellum. The dorsal part of anterior cingulated cortex (dACC) is an important region for decision making, and executive control is impaired in adult ADHD. Finally, dysfunction of basal ganglia is a consistent finding in childhood and adulthood ADHD, reflecting dysregulation of fronto-striatal circuitry. The cerebellum, and its role in affect and cognition, is also persistently implicated in the pathology of ADHD. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 237 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 13% |
| Researcher | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 50 | 20% |
| Unknown | 30 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 97 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 25 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 9% |
| Unknown | 39 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,397,827
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#125
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,715
of 68,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.