↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and natural history of depression after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS Medicine, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence and natural history of depression after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Published in
PLOS Medicine, March 2023
DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004200
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lu Liu, Min Xu, Iain J. Marshall, Charles DA Wolfe, Yanzhong Wang, Matthew DL O’Connell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Unspecified 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 31 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Unspecified 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 33 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,012,550
of 25,571,620 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#1,521
of 5,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,479
of 423,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#24
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,571,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.