You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Weed macaques: The evolutionary implications of macaque feeding ecology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Primatology, December 1989
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02739365 |
| Authors |
A. F. Richard, S. J. Goldstein, R. E. Dewar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 145 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 19% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Psychology | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2004.
All research outputs
#7,494,138
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#550
of 1,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,449
of 58,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.