You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Low-Input CUT&RUN for Mouse Oocytes and Preimplantation Embryos
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 6 |
| Book title |
Epigenomics
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-2724-2_6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-162723-5, 978-1-07-162724-2
|
| Authors |
Hayashi, Ryoya, Inoue, Azusa, Ryoya Hayashi, Azusa Inoue |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 11% |
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| France | 3 | 9% |
| Austria | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 21 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 14 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 38% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,861,794
of 25,466,764 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#239
of 14,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,897
of 438,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#2
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,466,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,214 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.