You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Stem Cells and Targeted Gene Therapy in Brain and Spinal Cord Tumors
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 9 |
| Book title |
Human Brain and Spinal Cord Tumors: From Bench to Bedside. Volume 1
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-031-14732-6_9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-114731-9, 978-3-03-114732-6
|
| Authors |
Pour-Rashidi, Ahmad, Mohammadi, Esmaeil, Rezaei, Nima, Hanaei, Sara |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2023.
All research outputs
#19,400,321
of 23,868,920 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,467
of 5,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,760
of 436,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#56
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,868,920 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.