↓ Skip to main content

Advancing Ethical Neuroscience Research

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advancing Ethical Neuroscience Research
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, December 2016
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.12.nlit1-1612
Pubmed ID
Authors

B Rashmi Borah, Nicolle K Strand, Kata L Chillag

Abstract

As neuroscience research advances, researchers, clinicians, and other stakeholders will face a host of ethical challenges. The Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues (Bioethics Commission) has published two reports that provide recommendations on how to advance research endeavors ethically. The commission addressed, among other issues, how to prioritize different types of neuroscience research and how to include research participants who have impaired consent capacity. The Bioethics Commission's recommendations provide a foundation for ethical guidelines as neuroscience research advances and progresses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 2 33%
Psychology 1 17%
Neuroscience 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%