↓ Skip to main content

Usutu Virus Persistence and West Nile Virus Inactivity in the Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy) in 2011

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Usutu Virus Persistence and West Nile Virus Inactivity in the Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy) in 2011
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0063978
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mattia Calzolari, Paolo Bonilauri, Romeo Bellini, Alessandro Albieri, Francesco Defilippo, Marco Tamba, Massimo Tassinari, Antonio Gelati, Paolo Cordioli, Paola Angelini, Michele Dottori

Abstract

The circulation of West Nile virus and Usutu virus was detected in the Emilia-Romagna region in 2008 and 2009. To evaluate the extent of circulation of both viruses, environmental surveillance, based on bird and mosquito testing, was conducted in 2008 and gradually improved over the years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Unknown 65 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 30%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 9%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2013.
All research outputs
#15,271,180
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#130,166
of 193,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,693
of 193,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,100
of 4,936 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,936 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.