↓ Skip to main content

Maternal Stress and Infant Mortality

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maternal Stress and Infant Mortality
Published in
Psychological Science, May 2013
DOI 10.1177/0956797612468010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quetzal A. Class, Ali S. Khashan, Paul Lichtenstein, Niklas Långström, Brian M. D’Onofrio

Abstract

Although preconception and prenatal maternal stress are associated with adverse outcomes in birth and childhood, their relation to infant mortality remains uncertain. We used logistic regression to study infant mortality risk following maternal stress within a population-based sample of infants born in Sweden between 1973 and 2008 (N = 3,055,361). Preconception (6-0 months before conception) and prenatal (between conception and birth) stress were defined as death of a first-degree relative of the mother. A total of 20,651 offspring were exposed to preconception stress, 26,731 offspring were exposed to prenatal stress, and 8,398 cases of infant mortality were identified. Preconception stress increased the risk of infant mortality independently of measured covariates, and this association was timing specific and robust across low-risk groups. Prenatal stress did not increase risk of infant mortality. These results suggest that the period immediately before conception may be a sensitive developmental period with ramifications for infant mortality risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Ghana 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Unknown 131 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 22%
Student > Master 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 15%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 18%
Social Sciences 24 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 24 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,712,456
of 26,112,783 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#2,171
of 4,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,448
of 207,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#64
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,112,783 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 86.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.