↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the clastogenic effects of antimony trioxide on micein vivo following acute and chronic exposure

Overview of attention for article published in BioMetals, March 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of the clastogenic effects of antimony trioxide on micein vivo following acute and chronic exposure
Published in
BioMetals, March 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf01079697
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neelam Gurnani, Archana Sharma, Geeta Talukder

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 15%
Lecturer 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Materials Science 2 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2000.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BioMetals
#191
of 702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,368
of 17,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMetals
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.