↓ Skip to main content

Periodic tense markers in the world’s languages and their sources

Overview of attention for article published in Folia Linguistica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 103)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Periodic tense markers in the world’s languages and their sources
Published in
Folia Linguistica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae, April 2023
DOI 10.1515/flin-2023-2013
Authors

Guillaume Jacques

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,604,556
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Folia Linguistica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae
#5
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,109
of 416,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Linguistica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them