↓ Skip to main content

Developing sustainable funding for vaccine safety infrastructure

Overview of attention for article published in Vaccine, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Developing sustainable funding for vaccine safety infrastructure
Published in
Vaccine, February 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.11.034
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven Black, Kim Mulholland, Neal A. Halsey

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#3,517,630
of 12,269,624 outputs
Outputs from Vaccine
#4,111
of 10,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,441
of 338,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccine
#76
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,269,624 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.