You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Swab Cultures Are Not As Effective As Tissue Cultures for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-013-2974-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vinay K. Aggarwal, Carlos Higuera, Gregory Deirmengian, Javad Parvizi, Matthew S. Austin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 21% |
| Unknown | 29 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 58% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 2% |
| Philosophy | 1 | <1% |
| Linguistics | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 34 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#14,642,418
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#4,391
of 7,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,072
of 213,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#54
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.